Comments on: Weekly Round Up – Digital Photography, TweetDeck, KeywordLuv

By: john @ work opportunities from home

john @ work opportunities from home — Sat, 05 Jun 2010 15:57:45 +0000

Interesting stats, I find that by writing for the people is almost as effective as going all out in the SEO department. It seems that when people find information that they find useful they’ll naturally link to it. This is what will allow more people to find that same information. Which is more important than search engine bots.
john recently posted..How To Work At Home? Get Some Tips

By: Karen

Karen — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:26:46 +0000

Hi Alan, everyone seems to enjoy my stats, they took of more that I actually thought they would..

By: Alan

Alan — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:30:51 +0000

Thanks for posting some of your traffic data – it’s always really interesting to see other sites’ analytics. I really like your ‘Thaw’ photo – the low viewpoint, shallow depth of field – it’s a great shot! I’ve just started getting into photography and that’s the kind of shot I’m looking to create in the future!
.-= Alan@Photography Tips is hoping you stop by and read 500D vs 550D: Which One Should You Buy? =-.

By: Karen

Karen — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:34:42 +0000

Thank you very much

By: lisa

lisa — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:30:48 +0000

wow you really have such a dedicated approach – its very inspiring

By: Adam

Adam — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:04:46 +0000

I love reading your stats every week. Keep it up and hopefully you get more and more traffic. .-= Adam@Interesting Articles is hoping you stop by and read Most Bought Vehicle of All Time =-.

By: Karen

Karen — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:30:53 +0000

You’re most welcome, you may just get some more linky love next week

By: Extreme John

Extreme John — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:00:38 +0000

Hey Karen thank you as always for the link play I appreciate it You know I am loving the top comment spot
.-= Extreme John is hoping you stop by and read NFC Championship Game Betting Lines and Prediction =-.

By: Ben

Ben — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:09:42 +0000

It would be interesting to know the number of referrals you’ve had from your top referrers. Either way, great to see that CMF Ads is once again at the top of the list
.-= Ben is hoping you stop by and read 100 tips for improving your blog in 2010 =-.

By: Matt

Matt — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:54:18 +0000

Rock on with your bad search self! I find my own search engine stats to be really odd. They are VERY skewed high towards the Big G...for example, in the last 7 days my search engine traffic was 174 visitors from google.com (and a handful from various other google.x domains, but I'm far too lazy to count them all together), but only 7 visitors from Yahoo, and 3 from Bing. .-= Matt@Good Old Rock is hoping you stop by and read Introduction to Lightroom =-.

By: Heather Kephart

Heather Kephart — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:59:19 +0000

Hey, cool about Yahoo! Google, too! That means you are generating organic traffic, which is totally awesome. I really enjoy watching your stats change from week to week. I really should pay more attention to my own, I’ve really slacked off lately.
.-= Heather Kephart is hoping you stop by and read Joe got his first real haircut! =-.

By: Karen

Karen — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:42:16 +0000

Hi Ileane, I don’t spend that much time on SEO and keyword research, I usually write my posts and then check to see if I can edit anything with certain keywords to help the post out a bit, but I don’t go mad on it

By: Ileane

Ileane — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:27:16 +0000

Karen, nice roundup as usual.

I could spend hours on the search engine world domination post from potpolitics, but I’ve got to write at least one blog post today. LOL

I think it’s very interesting to see your search engine traffic compared to your list of top posts. I’m curious about something, does most of the traffic from your top posts come from search engines or Blog Engage? Do you spend a lot of time on SEO and keyword research?

Keep up the good work.
.-= Ileane is hoping you stop by and read Technorati Attempts A Comeback =-.